In an exclusive interview with Oman Television, Larijani was asked whether the negotiations signal a genuine shift in how Tehran and Washington manage their disputes or remain within a crisis-management framework. He said multiple claims have been raised by the U.S. side. If negotiations on the nuclear file prove successful, he noted, they could be expanded in later stages to other areas, though at present it is not possible to confirm engagement on additional issues.
Larijani stressed that Iran has consistently maintained that war is not a solution to disputes between the two countries and that regional differences between Tehran and Washington should be resolved through dialogue. He added that reliance on the language of force by certain parties has been a mistake, complicating the negotiating path and creating multiple obstacles in the process.
Asked whether the ongoing negotiations could define the future shape of relations between Tehran and Washington, Larijani said it is too early for such a judgment, noting that what has occurred so far constitutes only one phase and that developments in the next stage will determine the broader trajectory.
He underscored that the success of negotiations depends on genuine political will on both sides. Adherence to a reasonable and realistic framework, he said, can lead to a successful outcome, whereas introducing excessive demands would result in failure. If the U.S. objective is to prevent Iran from moving toward a nuclear weapon, he added, the issue is resolvable; however, introducing other topics would complicate the process.
Regarding the timeline, Larijani said no specific schedule has been set and that Iran seeks clear solutions without delay. The issues under discussion are solvable, he stated, and would not require an extended timeframe if sufficient seriousness exists.
On whether negotiations can be separated from political and field developments in the region, Larijani said existing regional disputes are among the main drivers of tension and that addressing these issues would help restore stability and peace. Escalating tensions through military interventions, he added, further complicates the regional landscape, whereas resolving disputes would pave the way for development and progress across the region.
Assessing current U.S. policy toward Iran, Larijani said Washington’s traditional framework has become more realistic. Whereas the United States had previously linked the nuclear file to military and missile issues, the focus is now limited to the nuclear dossier, which he described as a rational approach.
He added that some governments still face difficulty in understanding the current situation and prevailing tensions, although certain disputes can be resolved through dialogue. In this context, he said the Israeli regime plays a prominent role in fueling tensions and creating crises in the region. Recent remarks by the regime’s prime minister during a visit to the United States concerning Iran’s nuclear file and the setting of a deadline for Tehran would create further complications.
Addressing the main obstacles to building a sustainable path of trust between Iran and the United States, Larijani said U.S. claims that Iran seeks to acquire nuclear weapons constitute a serious impediment. He reiterated that Tehran has explicitly declared it is not pursuing nuclear weapons and said the United States, in turn, could take steps to resolve certain outstanding issues.
Larijani also said regional countries have reached an advanced level in managing their own affairs and are seeking to resolve differences through peaceful means in order to avoid being drawn into new conflicts.
On the role of regional and international actors in reducing tensions, he said the region as a whole seeks peace and stability and is making sincere efforts to achieve that goal, although some countries do not demonstrate genuine willingness to end existing tensions. He called on regional states to recognize this reality in order to facilitate reconciliation and calm.
Larijani further emphasized the importance of Oman’s role in providing an appropriate environment for dialogue between Iran and the United States, describing it as “very positive.” He said Oman, due to its precise understanding of regional interests, familiarity with previous negotiation processes, and forward-looking perspective, is well positioned to play a constructive and effective role.
End Article
