Media: Military Officials Proposed War Stoppage with Iran to Trump
Tehran - BORNA - According to NBC News channel today (Tuesday), citing some informed sources, several US military officials proposed options to stop this war to Donald Trump, the US President, in their current plans for war with Iran.
Although Trump has considered plans for withdrawal, he has not yet made a decision on implementing them, and the timetable for stopping this military operation remains unclear and dependent on field developments.
Within the US government, there is a disagreement between two approaches. On one hand, advisors concerned about global economic instability and rising oil prices are pushing for a quick withdrawal strategy. On the other hand, other senior US officials regard this war as a historic opportunity to weaken "Iran's sovereign influence in the region."
"Carolyn Lewis," the White House spokesperson, referring to the Pentagon's (US Department of Defense) initial assessment that achieving goals would take four to six weeks, said: "This operation will end when the supreme commander of the armed forces confirms the achievement of goals."
Meanwhile, Iranian officials have repeatedly emphasized, both before the beginning of American-Zionist attacks and during them, that Tehran will be the one to end this war.
The Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20 percent of the world's oil passes, remains one of the most important challenges facing the United States. Since the attacks began, passage of oil tankers and ships through it has been halted, and more than 12 commercial ships have also been targeted.
Trump has asked countries such as China, Japan, and England to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, but to date, they and European leaders have refused to provide direct military support for this purpose.
According to US intelligence assessments, although "damage has been inflicted on Iran's military capabilities," there is currently no sign of the collapse of its sovereignty.
US experts emphasize: Tehran has considered this war as an existential confrontation and believes its capacity to endure difficulties is higher than that of its enemies.
End Article